I could get a lot of applause here from some quarters if I stood here and wrote "Electronic Arts is the worst company that has ever existed and every manager there should be tarred and feathered out of town!".

Yes, hating Electronic Arts has been in vogue in the last few years – actually for a long time – inclusive multiple awards as part of the annual ridicule prize as the worst company in the US.

But I don't want to go that far. EA, the worst company ever? That is massively too exaggerated, and you don't even have to use weapons manufacturers or medication lobbyists for comparison. Despite all the criticism, EA has also done a lot right, published good games, Bringing attention to indie teamsthat they would otherwise never have received and that they apparently treated very decently.

Of course, that's only one side of the coin, because nothing comes from nothing and the company has of course worked hard for the pent-up resentment of many fans.

Goodwill as a means to an end

So much is clear: Electronic Arts is not your friend, like any company you want to earn money – that's the only reason why seemingly selfless decisions are made. A good reputation brings good money, and also popular figures like Nintendo or (until recently) CD Projekt Red act no differently.

Meant other columns recently

Is violence awesome? Why some games go too far for me …
Remakes, remasters, and reprints are a mistake
Well-known on the PS5: Sony has a creativity problem
Whistle on creativity: Dear developers, steal ideas!
Achievements, trophies and co .: Stop doing stupid tasks!
Realism is annoying: Why games should just be games

Electronic Arts vs. Creativity: At the end of the day, everyone is screwed up (5)

Electronic Arts vs. Creativity: At the end of the day, everyone is spoiled.

Source: PC Games

Electronic Arts has not followed this path for a long time. Sure, players were treated to goodies and games that were interesting for them. Already relatively early on, however, they made a name for themselves as "the publisher who closes studios", often those who had developed popular series and had only recently been bought up by EA.

Westwood Studios, the makers of Command & Conquer? Bought in 1998, the lights went out in 2002. Maxis, the ladies and gentlemen behind SimCity? The curtain fell in 2015. Pandemic, the team behind the first Star Wars battlefront titles? 2009 was over, it was nice with you. And of course Visceral Games, you with yourself Dead space made a name and then worked on a Star Wars action adventure until they stopped doing that in 2017.

Studio corpses pave his way

Electronic Arts vs. Creativity: In the end, everyone is screwed up (2)

Electronic Arts vs. Creativity: In the end, everyone is screwed up (2)

Source: EA

And that was only a selection, you and me also remember Bullfrog Productions, Black Box Games, Dreamworks Interactive or Mythic Entertainment – rest in peace.

I am sure that in many cases the closings were inevitable or at least justified, but often enough they were purely calculating with a view to short-term profit. At the latest Visceral Games then caused absolute incomprehension among players. Simply ditching the teams of beloved games is a pretty lousy move not only for waiting fans, but also and above all for the employees.

And otherwise? EA announced games to be canceled soon afterwards, managed to release only a handful of Star Wars games in eight years of exclusive rights, not all of them great, thus bogging down promising titles from other manufacturers such as Star Wars 1313 on the sidelines, messed up once beloved series like Dungeon Keeper and Command & Conquer to unnecessary cashgrab mobile games, turned out to be one of the biggest culprits when it comes to real money content in full price games and other microtransactions and, and, and.

So yes: you have already worked hard on the bad reputation.

How to make yourself the bad guy

This strategy, which is designed to maximize profits quickly, cannot last long, because ultimately the most important capital is the paying, satisfied player, and a title like Star Wars Battlefront 2 for the release, measured against the expectations, was a financial disappointment, speaks volumes.

Well, EA would not have had to gnaw on the hunger cloth even if this strategy had simply been continued FIFA and Co. already taken care of, and – again with a view to FIFA and its aggressive paid content – the company is still no model boy. But yes, a change is noticeable.

What's next with Cal Kestis? Hopefully Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order 2 will soon have the answer.

Electronic Arts vs. Creativity: In the end, everyone is screwed up (6)

Source: Respawn Entertainment / EA

So all of a sudden come along Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order a single player game on the brand, although it was previously said fans "wouldn't want something like this". And all that without any microtransactions! Same with Star Wars: Squadrons, and big is now mentioned for every title if it does not try to pull the players over the table. This is a transparent strategy that should show "we're the good guys now!", But I'm still happy when something changes for the better.

Happy developers are good developers? Nobody could know!

Electronic Arts vs. Creativity: In the end, everyone is screwed up (3)

Electronic Arts vs. Creativity: In the end, everyone is screwed up (3)

Source: PC games hardware

And now the big insight and the reason I wrote this column: Suddenly EA realizes that pushing studios to develop is not a good thingthat are not suitable for them and that hated game elements are simply squeezed out of the way everywhere.

Who could have guessed that?

Dragon Age 4 can now be created without multiplayer and live service elements, all internal teams are given more decision-making power in their projects: Now studios are free to decide what they want to work on. Not directly said, but I hope it implies: Studios with some extremely long tradition will no longer be closed if a few billion euros in savings have to be made at the end of the financial year.

Whether all of this will be enough to transform Electronic Arts into a popular figure at some point remains to be seen, and also whether this large-scale change in behavior will eventually bring milking cows like FIFA on board and free them from their customer-unfriendly design.

The realization that creativity and quality cannot flourish when absolutely every aspect of development is regulated to death is a valuable one. Likewise, and this is my hope, goes hand in hand with showing greater consideration for the welfare of employees. The fact that employees at Bioware were sometimes tortured to the limit of their nervous resilience, Crunch was standard and apparent efficiency was paramount, should no longer be accepted.

Learn from the mistakes of others

Electronic Arts vs. Creativity: In the end, everyone is screwed up (4)

Electronic Arts vs. Creativity: In the end, everyone is screwed up (4)

Source: Bioware

Now that's it, I say the sentence with which I will finally pick up the verbal headbutt from many readers: I hope that many other manufacturers and studios will follow Electronic Arts as an example, if this new behavior has substance and not in three months is just a nice memory. The Activisions and Blizzards, Ubisofts and how they are not all called in this world would do well to think further than until the next investor meeting. Then you can build something that will endure and at the same time renounce to be seen as the devil who has descended on earth – is not the worst either.

Ultimately, destructive financial thinking simply ruins everything – the joy of the players, the quality of life of the developers, Success and reputation of manufacturers. And if all of this can be avoided by simply acting morally and humanely, there is no excuse to act differently.

Am I naive with my point of view? Maybe – but sometimes it's just really good to believe that something can get better.

how do you see it? Do you share my point of view? Tell me in the comments!


    • pcgh.de

      Image for PCGH advice recommendation for less than 3,000 euros

(*) We have marked affiliate links with an asterisk. We receive a small commission for a purchase via our link and can thus partially finance the website, which can be used free of charge, with this income. There are no costs for the user.