If you read through the interview by colleague Matthias Dammes with the creators of Mass Effect: Legendary Edition, you will notice how important it is for the developers to constantly emphasize that the new game would capture the spirit of the original and that you would don't want to make too big changes.

Last but not least, this fact has got me thinking in the last few days, and with a view to the countless remasters, remakes and other new editions that have appeared in recent years, I have realized that with the concept of these rebirths I am sometimes decades old Title generally have a problem.

Not because of the often criticized lack of creativity that many players accuse the developers and publishers of in the face of this flood of new editions. No, that doesn't affect me, I recently processed my opinion on the subject of creativity in video games in a column and in this case see it, at least from this perspective, only as a secondary aspect.

What bothers me is the principle of tinkering with ready-made games. When it comes to creativity, I find it much worse how the vision of the former makers is sometimes trampled underfoot.







Remakes, remasters and reprints are a mistake - Column (2)



Remakes, remasters and reprints are a mistake – Column (2)

Source: Bioware




Every game development is a product of its time, shaped by what was en vogue at the time and what was technically possible. If you look at it ten, twenty, thirty years later, I understand the idea that you want to lend a hand here to make the old ham "better", "more modern".

I consciously exclude the fact that most new editions are only created because money can be made with comparatively little development effort and an established brand, that's not my point.

But why are some games great? Especially BECAUSE they were created under conditions that made it necessary to think outside the box in order to circumvent the numerous technical restrictions that stood in the way of a developer. The iconic fog of a Silent Hill would not have existed if the PS1 had not had to struggle with the representation of objects in the distance.







Remakes, remasters and reprints are a mistake - Column (6)



Remakes, remasters and reprints are a mistake – Column (6)

Source: Mobygames




Silent Hill, a good example. Let's take a look at the remakes of Silent Hill 2 and 3 that came out for the PS3. What was done The graphics were far too sharp, the side far too thinned out, apparently because the creators had not understood the value of these restrictions and simply delivered what was now technically possible for them much more easily.

This is an extreme case, but I find this "we can do better" idea generally disrespectful to the team that developed the original game behind a new edition. Often enough, mostly, it is not the men and women of yore who are also responsible for the remake or remaster. There is adjustment, tweaking, changing, often enough simply because you think that is required of you.







Remakes, remasters and reprints are a mistake - Column (5)



Remakes, remasters and reprints are a mistake – Column (5)

Source: Lucasfilm




The other case is the same as with the Mass Effect: Legendary Edition (buy now € 69.99 /€ 53.99 ), where a large part of the previous developers are still sitting. But again, I wonder if the developers really need to be praised for tinkering with their own baby. And the changes are by no means as subtle as claimed: Part 1 should feel more playfully like Part 3, the controls have been changed, the lighting mood in some scenes is completely different and, and, and.

In other forms of media, this would lead to criticism, or it would regularly lead to criticism. The best example here is of course Star Wars, where George Lucas almost compulsively constantly before selling the brand to Disney improved the look and individual aspects of the original trilogy". Han shot first," Noooooo! "Celebrating Gungans and Hayden Christensen as a power spirit have meanwhile become memes and impressively show why some things should just be left as they are.

The Lord of the Rings – now with 30 more pages!

Again referring to revisions by people who weren't even involved in the original project: Let's transfer that to books and imagine that the novel by a celebrated author would be reprinted years later and the responsible rewriter would delete adjectives, add sentences, Rearrange chapters and intervene in some other way so that, in his opinion, the work feels "rounder". Hardly anyone would think so, would they?







Remakes, remasters and reprints are a mistake - Column (3)



Remakes, remasters and reprints are a mistake – Column (3)

Source: PC Games




In this context: Yes, I am of course aware of the discussion about the adaptation of children's books in particular because of nowadays unacceptable terms and I take the view that, apart from particularly blatant cases, one should rather work with critical, classifying footnotes. But this discussion is again a different one, and the case where the N-word in a video game is thrown at your feet without context is likely to be rare.

So am I generally against making old games accessible to a new generation? No of course not. I am aware that there is still a great deal of interest among younger players in older titles that do not run on modern PCs or that require the possession of an ancient console. Games are welcome to come back, but then not for an end in itself, to give them an apparently modern look anyway. Emulated ports or ports that have been adapted to new hardware can of course not exactly implement the spirit of the original, but are at least close and do not put an unsolicited "now obsolete!" Stamp on the originals.







Remakes, remasters and reprints are a mistake - Column (4)



Remakes, remasters and reprints are a mistake – Column (4)

Source: plassma media agency




Of course, I am also not prepared to have fun with a remake or remaster of the type that I criticize at this point, The Legend of Zelda: Link's Awakening for Switch, for example, I think it's great! But the fact that I enjoy this and other games does not speak against the problem itself, and the new Link's Awakening is a good example of the dangers that arise from the wave of new editions: The new edition should de facto make the Game Boy classic have been replaced. It is an impressive testimony to how you can create something great under the most adverse circumstances on a device that was already obsolete when it was released in 1992. As beautiful as the remake is, the achievement of being something special in the context of its development will never be associated with it.

So we have come to the core of the problem, as I see it: Games are, at least from the point of view of those who want to earn money with them, still primarily goods, so the discussion about the question of whether they are now called Art are to be viewed or not (are they), no matter how raging. Where other forms of media proceed much more cautiously when classics are revived and criticism quickly becomes loud when the work is poor or too aggressive, video gamers too often get caught up in the fact that there are generally too many new editions. That's right, but it's not a problem because of that, but because of the implications this circumstance has.

Do I encourage the laziness of the studios through this perspective, which would then have to put even less effort into new editions than some of them already do? Yes, somehow. That is why it is probably best to find a balance between the modern approach and the original, like the remastered versions of the Monkey Island Point & Click Adventures do. If you want, you will find a significantly revised, modern version, because you can switch to the original game at any time, but it never runs the risk of getting under the remake wheels with regard to its meaning.

This is not just feasible for every game. But I think you owe at least the attempt to give the game due respect due to the potential success of the new edition as a developer.

how do you see it? Tell me in the comments!

Supports PC Games – it only takes a minute. Thank you!

We give all readers daily free news, articles, guides, videos and podcasts on their favorite games. So far we have financed this site through advertising and kept it as free of clickbaits or paid items as possible, but since COVID-19 this has become increasingly difficult. Many companies are cutting or cutting their advertising budgets for 2020. Budgets that we unfortunately have to rely on if we want to continue to offer PC games free of charge as usual in the future.

For this reason we turn to you now. As a PC Games supporter, you can support us so that we can continue to offer our content in the usual form for free, without introducing a paywall or publishing clickbait news like "And you won't believe what happened next …" . Every contribution, large or small, is valuable.

Support now

We thank you in advance.

Also popular with PC games readers PcPS4XBO

Mass Effect Legendary Edition: Reveal trailer introduces the graphics

EA and Bioware announce via trailer that the Mass Effect Legendary Edition will be released worldwide on May 14, 2021 on PC (Origin and Steam) as well as on PS4 and Xbox One (compatibility mode for PS5 and Xbox Series X | S). The Legendary Edition includes the basic single player content as well as more than 40 story, weapon and armor DLCs from Mass Effect, Mass Effect 2 and Mass Effect 3. It is intended to enable players to "experience the legend of Commander Shepard in 4K Ultra HD Experience HDR ". The two versions of the PG 03/2021 "src =" https://www.pcgames.de/screenshots/237x133/2021/02/PCG_0321_Cover_Promo_layer_1920x1080-buffed_b2teaser_169.jpg

PC Games 03/21 with Mass Effect: L.E., Resident Evil 8 and much more. m.

The PC Games 03/21 with cover story for Mass Effect: Legendary Edition, preview of Resident Evil Village, Hitman 3 in the test and much more. m. Mass Effect: Legendary Edition - The remaster changes some camera angles (1) "src =" https://www.pcgames.de/screenshots/237x133/2021/02/MassEffect-LegendaryEdition-04-pc-games_b2teaser_169.pngPcPS4XBO

Mass Effect: LE – Sexist camera perspectives are defused

The Mass Effect trilogy has some scenes where the camera is very unfavorable. These were changed with the Legendary Edition.

(*) We have marked affiliate links with an asterisk. We receive a small commission for a purchase via our link and can thus partially finance the free website with this income. There are no costs for the user.